|
Num Posts
Sort Order
|
pht.wgn
New User
| Posts: 3
| Joined: 04/08
Posted: 05/02/08 02:45 AM
|
|
revolutionary: That 250/255 cam doesn't seem to have much lift for the duration it has. Leads me to believe it isn't very aggressive. Low lift and a tight lobe separation will probably make a lot of noise but not as much power as some of the grinds that are currently available from the big names.
True it is not to big on the lift side tho i did get the camshaft given to me about 10 year ago. as it was a cheapy engine just to get the car on the road back then. Im in the process of rebuilding the car and engine wanting to go to a larger lift maybe 560-580 thou and slightly larger duration combo maybe 260-265 duration with maybe 107 lobe centers thanks for your thoughts
|
JAKEJR
New User
| Posts: 3
| Joined: 05/08
Posted: 05/02/08 01:07 PM
|
|
I agree. Not only should the LSA be listed but, also, what the cam was degreed in at and the degreeing method use - lobe centerline method, .050, any other.
I saw one of the cams was ground on 106 yet installed at 98. That is a significant difference, since most times a cam is only advanced 2-4 degrees. A full 8 degrees is a biggie.
Jake
|
|
|